Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4436931-20160718170901/@comment-28224025-20160719145258

Tenma would be around an elementary school kid at this point in time, he won't do anything other than be a scout character Yh, I know.

That's why I think that his chances of appearing are extremely low, if not zero. They are already done with Tenma. Scout character, sure. But if the new Inazuma somehow conects with GO, Tenma won't do much, since like you said, he's a small kid at this point, and a sakka amateur [actually he started liking it because Gouenji saved his life, and that was when Ayyliea dorks were kekking around].

Hino explicitly stated that there wouldn't be Keshin. People didn't really like Keshin/Souls. It wouldn't be a problem to get rid of them since Keshins first appear in GO, not the original series -Yes, I'm aware of that.

IMHO, listening to the fans is silly. The author should feel free to use his/her concepts and ideas. I liked Keshins, didn't like Souls [except Ixaal and Grizzly, they are dope sick], but I still respect people who like em, plus, I understand the Souls concept, so I wouldn't desire their removal, because there are people who LIKE them.

I was talking about getting rid of them completely, like, removing the features from the games.

Keshin and MMax weren't used in Galaxy, but these features were still there [in the games].

eg >> The first game didn't have evolutions, Shoot Chain, etc. The later games had, and they were never removed. GO and CS had keshins, Galaxy introduced Souls, but they didn't get rid of the Keshin/MMax features. What I'm trying to say: Removing the previous features won't be a cool idea, tbh. Think about removing Pokémon genders, shiny system, special/physical etc. They just can't remove important features like that... So the Keshins/MMax/Soul might be available after you beat the game. New games should add new features, not remove old ones [well, there might be exceptions, but...] lol